<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Technically Legal Podcast: Episode 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.technicallylegal.org/technically-legal-podcast-episode-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.technicallylegal.org/technically-legal-podcast-episode-2/</link>
	<description>Technology and the law. Done right.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 07:19:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Technically Legal &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Bilski Is(n&#8217;t) About Software Patents</title>
		<link>http://www.technicallylegal.org/technically-legal-podcast-episode-2/comment-page-1/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>Technically Legal &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Bilski Is(n&#8217;t) About Software Patents</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technicallylegal.org/?p=152#comment-69</guid>
		<description>[...] Podcast 2, we spent a good amount of time talking about Bilski, a case the Supreme Court will hear next year [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color:#F0F8FF; padding:.8em .8em .8em .8em; outline:#eeeeee solid thin; border: 2px; border-style:solid; border-color:#eeeeee">
<p>[...] Podcast 2, we spent a good amount of time talking about Bilski, a case the Supreme Court will hear next year [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
