<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Episode 27: Groundbreaking Website</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.technicallylegal.org/episode-27-groundbreaking-website/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.technicallylegal.org/episode-27-groundbreaking-website/</link>
	<description>Technology and the law. Done right.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 12:57:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Technically Legal &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Federal Circuit Moves Patent Case Out of Texas</title>
		<link>http://www.technicallylegal.org/episode-27-groundbreaking-website/comment-page-1/#comment-872</link>
		<dc:creator>Technically Legal &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Federal Circuit Moves Patent Case Out of Texas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 18:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technicallylegal.org/?p=588#comment-872</guid>
		<description>[...] up on our discussion about bringing patent suits in the Eastern District (E.D.) of Texas on Podcast 27, the Federal Circuit (the Federal Appeals court that hears all patent cases) issued a ruling today [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color:#F0F8FF; padding:.8em .8em .8em .8em; outline:#eeeeee solid thin; border: 2px; border-style:solid; border-color:#eeeeee">
<p>[...] up on our discussion about bringing patent suits in the Eastern District (E.D.) of Texas on Podcast 27, the Federal Circuit (the Federal Appeals court that hears all patent cases) issued a ruling today [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
