<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Technically Legal &#187; Uncategorized</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.technicallylegal.org/category/uncategorized/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.technicallylegal.org</link>
	<description>Technology and the law. Done right.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 19:11:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Podcast Revival</title>
		<link>http://www.technicallylegal.org/podcast-revival/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technicallylegal.org/podcast-revival/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 19:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David O&#39;Brien</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technicallylegal.org/?p=2031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last month, I mentioned that we will be bringing back the podcast.  I&#8217;m excited to announce that, in the next two weeks, we hope to publish our first show since going on hiatus.   Dominik and I will be joined by Andy Sellars, a close colleague and a fellow at the Berkman Center.  We hope Andy [...]
No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last month, <a href="http://www.technicallylegal.org/things-to-come/">I mentioned</a> that we will be bringing back the podcast.  I&#8217;m excited to announce that, in the next two weeks, we hope to publish our first show since going on hiatus.   Dominik and I will be joined by <a href="http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/asellars">Andy Sellars</a>, a close colleague and a fellow at the Berkman Center.  We hope Andy will continue to join us on episodes as we move forward.</p>
<p>A few notes about the new show format we&#8217;ll be using.  Rather than publishing podcasts weekly, we are going to move to a less-frequent, less-structured schedule.  Frequency will somewhat depend on the news cycle, but I would expect 1-2 episodes per month, at least.  Additionally, instead of covering 2-3 stories, we will likely discuss 1-2 stories per episode but keep the show length around 30-45 minutes.  The idea here is to elicit deeper conversations on interesting topics while avoiding fluffy coverage.</p>
<p>As always, we welcome your comments and suggestions about the show and the new format: e-mail us at podcast[--at--]technically.org.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technicallylegal.org/podcast-revival/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re: Deletion of Older Posts</title>
		<link>http://www.technicallylegal.org/re-deletion-of-older-posts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technicallylegal.org/re-deletion-of-older-posts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 11:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TechnicallyLegal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technicallylegal.org/?p=1778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Readers, Over the next few days you&#8217;ll notice that a large amount of old content will be taken down. We apologize for the inconvenience. It is, however, necessary. The site will continue on, albeit in a modified fashion. Podcasts will be less frequent, but there will hopefully be more substantive posts. Thank you for your [...]
No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?-->Readers,</p>
<div>Over the next few days you&#8217;ll notice that a large amount of old content will be taken down. We apologize for the inconvenience. It is, however, necessary. The site will continue on, albeit in a modified fashion. Podcasts will be less frequent, but there will hopefully be more substantive posts.</div>
<div>Thank you for your understanding.</div>
<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technicallylegal.org/re-deletion-of-older-posts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

