<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Technically Legal &#187; Podcast</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.technicallylegal.org/category/podcast/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.technicallylegal.org</link>
	<description>Technology and the law. Done right.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 19:11:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Things to come&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.technicallylegal.org/things-to-come/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technicallylegal.org/things-to-come/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2011 00:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David O&#39;Brien</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Podcast]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technicallylegal.org/?p=2025</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#8217;ve probably noticed that earlier this fall we took an abrupt hiatus that coincided with some changes on our website.  Unfortunately, one of our co-bloggers accepted a new position at a firm which, as a condition to his acceptance, politely asked him to remove public commentary on legal issues.  This isn&#8217;t an uncommon request for [...]
No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve probably noticed that earlier this fall we took an <a href="http://www.technicallylegal.org/re-deletion-of-older-posts/" target="_blank">abrupt hiatus</a> that coincided with some changes on our website.  Unfortunately, one of our co-bloggers accepted a new position at a firm which, as a condition to his acceptance, politely asked him to remove public commentary on legal issues.  This isn&#8217;t an uncommon request for law firms or employers to make, as it&#8217;s important for lawyers to observe the rules of <a href="http://www.americanbar.org/groups/professional_responsibility/publications/model_rules_of_professional_conduct/model_rules_of_professional_conduct_table_of_contents.html" target="_blank">professional conduct</a> and for law firms to maintain strong relationships with their clients.  Together we decided it best to comply with the request, rethink the basic structure of our site, and bid our co-founder good luck on his next adventure.  For the last two and a half years this site has been (and continues to be) a hobby that stands apart from our professional careers &#8212; it was an easy, but sad, decision to make.</p>
<p>This event also coincided with a sudden uptick of work in my own professional life, including the <a href="http://dp.la/" target="_blank">Digital Public Library of America (DPLA)</a> launch in October and a myriad of other interesting research projects (some of which I hope to share in the coming months).  The workload made it difficult to think about, let alone attempt, a format transition on the blog or podcast; and so, the site has been fairly dormant for the last several months.</p>
<p>There is, however,  some good news to share.  Since going on hiatus I&#8217;ve received a number of emails from friends and colleagues, including a handful of <a href="http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/fellows" target="_blank">fellows from the Berkman Center</a>, who want to see and participate on some new episodes of the podcast.  While there are still a number of details to hammer out, like scope and frequency among other things, I&#8217;m hopeful that we&#8217;ll bring back the show in some form in early 2012, shortly after the holidays.</p>
<p>Thanks for tuning in!</p>
<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technicallylegal.org/things-to-come/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Episode 109: It&#8217;s not exactly generic</title>
		<link>http://www.technicallylegal.org/episode-109-its-not-exactlygeneric/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technicallylegal.org/episode-109-its-not-exactlygeneric/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 06:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David O&#39;Brien</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Podcast]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technicallylegal.org/?p=1742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ISPs sign agreement with content owners, Apple loses first round of App Store fight Please download the podcast or subscribe to the feed.  Feel free to e-mail us with comments and suggestions. ISPs agree to police their subscribers use of copyrighted content (sort of) Ars Technica Coverage The Official Agreement (PDF) Apple loses motion for [...]
No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ISPs sign agreement with content owners, Apple loses first round of App Store fight</p>
<p>Please <a href="http://www.technicallylegal.org/podcast/Technically_Legal_Episode_109.mp3" target="_blank">download the podcast</a> or <a href="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/TechnicallyLegalPodcast">subscribe to the feed</a>.  Feel free to <a href="mailto:podcast@technicallylegal.org">e-mail</a> us with comments and suggestions.</p>
<h3>ISPs agree to police their subscribers use of copyrighted content (sort of)</h3>
<p><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/07/major-isps-agree-to-six-strikes-copyright-enforcement-plan.ars" target="_blank">Ars Technica Coverage</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www3.buzzmakerdev.net/~cci/sites/default/files/Momorandum%20of%20Understanding.pdf" target="_blank">The Official Agreement</a> (PDF)</p>
<h3>Apple loses motion for preliminary injunction over &#8220;App Store&#8221; mark</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/59495291/Decision-Apple-v-Amazon-Prelim-AppStore" target="_blank">The Opinion</a> (via Scrib&#8217;d)</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/07/app_store_isnt.htm" target="_blank">Eric Goldman&#8217;s thoughts</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technicallylegal.org/episode-109-its-not-exactlygeneric/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://www.technicallylegal.org/podcast/Technically_Legal_Episode_109.mp3" length="42639734" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Episode 96: A new streaming model?</title>
		<link>http://www.technicallylegal.org/episode-96-a-new-streaming-model/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technicallylegal.org/episode-96-a-new-streaming-model/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 03:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David O&#39;Brien</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dvds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fair Use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Streaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zediva]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technicallylegal.org/?p=1567</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Zediva gets sued by several movie studios and France wants Google to save your personal information for a year (if you live in France). Please download the podcast or subscribe to the feed.  Feel free to e-mail us with comments and suggestions. Zediva Gets Sued by the Movie Studios Zediva&#8217;s new movie rental model Zediva [...]
Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.technicallylegal.org/weekly-links-april-3-9-2011/' rel='bookmark' title='Weekly Links: April 3rd &#8211; 9th, 2011'>Weekly Links: April 3rd &#8211; 9th, 2011</a> <small>Another busy week has already passed us by!  Here&#8217;s what&#8217;s...</small></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zediva gets sued by several movie studios and France wants Google to save your personal information for a year (if you live in France).</p>
<p>Please <a href="http://www.technicallylegal.org/podcast/Technically_Legal_Episode_96.mp3" target="_blank">download the podcast</a> or <a href="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/TechnicallyLegalPodcast">subscribe to the feed</a>.  Feel free to <a href="mailto:podcast@technicallylegal.org">e-mail</a> us with comments and suggestions.</p>
<h3>Zediva Gets Sued by the Movie Studios</h3>
<p><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/03/is-zedivas-new-release-movie-streaming-service-legal.ars" target="_blank">Zediva&#8217;s new movie rental model</a></p>
<p><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/04/movie-studios-sue-dvd-streaming-site-zediva.ars" target="_blank">Zediva gets sued by the studios</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/epicenter/2011/04/Zediva-Complaint.pdf" target="_blank">The complaint</a></p>
<h3>Google Challenges New French Requirement to Store Personal Information For a Year, Including Passwords(?!)</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5gcIROpaIgngw8P1fO7BXywMIhe5Q?docId=CNG.897aaf456d2691082257863ec5125653.311" target="_blank">Article </a></p>
<p>Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://www.technicallylegal.org/weekly-links-april-3-9-2011/' rel='bookmark' title='Weekly Links: April 3rd &#8211; 9th, 2011'>Weekly Links: April 3rd &#8211; 9th, 2011</a> <small>Another busy week has already passed us by!  Here&#8217;s what&#8217;s...</small></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technicallylegal.org/episode-96-a-new-streaming-model/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://www.technicallylegal.org/podcast/Technically_Legal_Episode_96.mp3" length="35902018" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Episode 90: Smurfberry recession? Pffft.</title>
		<link>http://www.technicallylegal.org/episode-90-smurfberry-recession-pffft/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technicallylegal.org/episode-90-smurfberry-recession-pffft/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 05:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David O&#39;Brien</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Podcast]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technicallylegal.org/?p=1459</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry for the late post &#8212; I&#8217;ve been out of the country and Ben has been busy sharing the flu with Boston.  This week we cover the Wisconsin Statehouse, some Smurfs apps and kids (dangerous combination), and the International Music Score Library Project. Please download the podcast or subscribe to the feed.  Feel free to [...]
No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for the late post &#8212; I&#8217;ve been out of the country and Ben has been busy sharing the flu with Boston.  This week we cover the Wisconsin Statehouse, some Smurfs apps and kids (dangerous combination), and the International Music Score Library Project.</p>
<p>Please <a href="http://www.technicallylegal.org/podcast/Technically_Legal_Episode_90.mp3">download the podcast</a> or <a href="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/TechnicallyLegalPodcast">subscribe to the feed</a>.  Feel free to <a href="mailto:podcast@technicallylegal.org">e-mail</a> us with comments and suggestions.</p>
<h3>Wisconsin Statehouse Accused of Blocking Access to Website</h3>
<p><a href="http://techpresident.com/blog-entry/does-smell-right-wisconsin-governors-new-website-blacklisting">Does this smell right? Wisconsin Governor&#8217;s &#8220;new website&#8221; blacklisting</a></p>
<h3>The FTC is Worried About Kids Buying Smurfberries Using their Parents&#8217; iPhones</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2011/02/23/federal-trade-commission-is-reviewing-apple-s-in-app-purchase-sy/">FTC is reviewing Apple&#8217;s in-app-purchase system</a></p>
<h3>The International Music Score Library Project &#8212; pretty cool.</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/22/arts/music/22music-imslp.html?_r=2&amp;pagewanted=all">Free trove of music scores on web hits sensitive copyright note</a>﻿</p>
<p><a href="http://imslp.org/">http://imslp.org</a></p>
<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technicallylegal.org/episode-90-smurfberry-recession-pffft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://www.technicallylegal.org/podcast/Technically_Legal_Episode_90.mp3" length="52349763" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Episode 64: Big, Scary Design Patents!</title>
		<link>http://www.technicallylegal.org/episode-64-big-scary-design-patents/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technicallylegal.org/episode-64-big-scary-design-patents/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 03:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David O&#39;Brien</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Neutrality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technicallylegal.org/?p=1173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple gets a couple of scary design patents, AT&#38;T thinks wireless is different, and Oracle sues the Java out of Google. Please download the podcast or subscribe to the feed.  Feel free to e-mail us with comments and suggestions. Apple Design Patents Article (via TUAW) Patent #s: D621848, D621849 AT&#38;T on Net Neutrality AT&#38;T&#8217;s Statement [...]
No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple gets a couple of scary design patents, AT&amp;T thinks wireless is different, and Oracle sues the Java out of Google.</p>
<p>Please <a href="http://www.technicallylegal.org/podcast/Technically_Legal_Episode_64.mp3">download the podcast</a> or <a href="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/TechnicallyLegalPodcast">subscribe to the feed</a>.  Feel free to <a href="mailto:podcast@technicallylegal.org">e-mail</a> us with comments and suggestions.</p>
<h3>Apple Design Patents</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2010/08/17/apple-awarded-patents-for-slide-to-unlock-keyboard-letter-pop/" target="_blank">Article</a> (via <em>TUAW</em>)</p>
<p>Patent #s: <a href="http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&amp;Sect2=HITOFF&amp;u=/netahtml/PTO/search-adv.htm&amp;r=1&amp;f=G&amp;l=50&amp;d=PTXT&amp;p=1&amp;p=1&amp;S1=D621848.PN.&amp;OS=pn/D621848&amp;RS=PN/D621848" target="_blank">D621848</a>, <a href="http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&amp;Sect2=HITOFF&amp;u=/netahtml/PTO/search-adv.htm&amp;r=1&amp;f=G&amp;l=50&amp;d=PTXT&amp;p=1&amp;p=1&amp;S1=D621849.PN.&amp;OS=pn/D621849&amp;RS=PN/D621849" target="_blank">D621849</a></p>
<h3>AT&amp;T on Net Neutrality</h3>
<p><a href="http://attpublicpolicy.com/government-policy/wireless-is-different/" target="_blank">AT&amp;T&#8217;s Statement</a></p>
<h3>Oracle (d/b/a Sun) Sues Google Over Java (N.D.CA, No. 1418106)</h3>
<p><a href="http://techcrunch.com/2010/08/13/android-oracle-java-lawsuit/" target="_blank">Article</a> (via <em>Tech Crunch</em>)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.technicallylegal.org/docs/Oracle.v.Google.Complaint.8.2010.pdf" target="_blank">Complaint</a></p>
<p>Ben and David Lu!! are MIA this week.</p>
<p>2^6</p>
<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technicallylegal.org/episode-64-big-scary-design-patents/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://www.technicallylegal.org/podcast/Technically_Legal_Episode_64.mp3" length="44530222" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Episode 61: My Dongle Was Circumvented</title>
		<link>http://www.technicallylegal.org/episode-61-my-dongle-was-circumvented/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technicallylegal.org/episode-61-my-dongle-was-circumvented/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 03:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David O&#39;Brien</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anticircumvention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DMCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technicallylegal.org/?p=1125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Library of Congress releases new DMCA anti-circumvention exemptions, 5th Circuit rules in favor of Fair Use under the DMCA&#8217;s anti-circumvention provisions, and a few major companies sued for using features in flash cookies. Please download the podcast or subscribe to the feed.  Feel free to e-mail us with comments and suggestions. New DMCA Anti-circumvention Exemptions [...]
No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Library of Congress releases new DMCA anti-circumvention exemptions, 5th Circuit rules in favor of Fair Use under the DMCA&#8217;s anti-circumvention provisions, and a few major companies sued for using features in flash cookies.</p>
<p>Please <a href="http://www.technicallylegal.org/podcast/Technically_Legal_Episode_61.mp3">download the podcast</a> or<a href="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/TechnicallyLegalPodcast"> subscribe to the feed</a>.  Feel free to <a href="mailto:podcast@technicallylegal.org">e-mail</a> us with comments and suggestions.</p>
<h3>New DMCA Anti-circumvention Exemptions</h3>
<p>Read about it on <a href="http://www.technicallylegal.org/librarian-of-congress-eases-dmca-restrictions/" target="_blank">our blog</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://copyright.gov/1201" target="_blank">U.S. Copyright Office Release</a></p>
<p>Provisions in DMCA: <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode17/usc_sec_17_00001201----000-.html" target="_blank">17 U.S.C. § 1201 </a></p>
<h3>5th Circuit, Section 1201, and MGE v. GE, No. 08-10521 (5th Cir. 2010)</h3>
<p>Read about it on <a href="http://arstechnica.com/software/news/2010/07/court-breaking-drm-for-a-fair-use-is-legal.ars" target="_blank"><em>Ars Technica</em></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/08/08-10521-CV0.wpd.pdf" target="_blank">5th Circuit&#8217;s Opinion</a></p>
<h3>Flash cookies: Valdez, et al. v. Quntcast, MySpace, Hulu, NBC, ESPN, et. al</h3>
<p>Read about it on <a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2010/07/privacy-lawsuit-targets-net-giants-over-zombie-cookies.ars" target="_blank"><em>Ars Technica</em></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/threatlevel/2010/07/CV10-5484-GW-JCGx-Complaint-Summons-Civil-Case-Cover-Sheet1.pdf" target="_blank">Complaint</a> (courtesy of <em>Wired</em>)</p>
<p>In other news, Ben and David Lu!! are traveling around the country and had to miss this week&#8217;s recording.  Also, audio quality might be a little poor (some nasty background noise and a few bad audio splices while editing); apologies in advance.</p>
<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technicallylegal.org/episode-61-my-dongle-was-circumvented/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://www.technicallylegal.org/podcast/Technically_Legal_Episode_61.mp3" length="63587523" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

